Not that I ever really expect to know everything about the game, or even a small amount but it is interesting to note that more or less everytime I log off from the game, I have experienced something new or made a mental link/leap to understanding a little bit more of the game.
My latest is finally starting to get a grasp of the ship loadouts that I fly. Up until this point, I have mostly scoured the internet looking for ship loadouts that made sense to me for my style of play. This is good to give you a foundation but I always felt that I was not really participating in the process, more playing the sheep that follows. Now, I understand that popular fits are popular for a reason and absolutely should be taken note of, even so the following are a few traps I’ve fallen into as a new player:
1) Bigger guns! got to get bigger guns! – no. in short. This is not the answer – it is much better to specialise in one weapon than be mediocre in a few, whatever the size
2) I just popped – more armour is needed! – not necessarily true. Having spent a few nights on the roam with some corpmates, I was surprised at how many different approaches to limiting damage there actually are. Yes, you can shield tank, yes you can armour tank if you want to stand in the middle and take a pounding but this is not the only answer. Speed tanking is very effective (although I’m not really brave enough to try that one yet) but also think about ewar, being Gallente I am specifically thinking ECM drones here. If the target can’t lock you, he can’t hit you (this was a particular revelation last night, time to train up the drones a bit more).
3) Is the armour repairer really worth it? Possibly if you are out for a long roam but there are nearly always stations to dock in – is it better to bring the pain with an extra damage modifier and go for the faster kill or better to try and keep yourself in the engagement longer. Jury is still out on this one, but having lost all of my ships whilst trying to rep, I’m no longer convinced that the cap is worth it – particularly if we are going to bring in the ECM drones..
4) Corp. Yes I read it numerous times but it really does make a difference to be in a good corp – just listening to the vent chatter around fits and tactics goes a long way to answering questions or pointing you in new directions that might not have been considered.
Next to consider is the engagements I’ve been in where I have lost ships. A lot of times, I’ve been simply out ganked – as mentioned above this brings into question the use of the armour repairer. It hasn’t saved me in those scenarios so I no longer have much faith in their worth. Other times I have been neut/nos’d – initially my response was to train up autocannons as they just keep going, not requiring any CPU. This bothers me though as I’m not getting best use of the bonuses for the ships I fly (most notably the Thorax). This has caused me some frustration, BUT if I can introduce the ECM drones, this is a problem that may no longer exist (albeit the jamming is chance based). So, specialise in Hybrids & ECM drones appears to be the answer here.
So where does this leave me with the other equipment I’ve so far been using? I don’t really like using Nos as it removes an extra weapon slot and they only drain down to the equivalent of my own CPU which in my mind means that they are only useful if you are already screwed. To me, this is not the way to approach a battle. Neuts are more effective but they take more cap and also remove a weapon slot, again something that doesn’t really sit comfortably with me. Armour reppers have already been discussed.
Conclusions? lose the nos/neut, armour reppers, add the damage modifiers and medium hybrids (specialised) and try to avoid damage via ECM drones. Lo and behold, a training plan is born. This may fail spectacularly when put into practice, but it is a plan and loadout that I have realised fits how I currently want to approach engagements and feel most comfortable with at this time. No doubt this will adapt, be tweaked and grow and its effectiveness is still yet to be seen but it is a conclusion that I have come to through personal experience of numerous losses which puts me back in the pilots seat, as it were.
